PROGRAM ESTABLISHMENT
The Regents of the University of California approved a resolution in January 1995 to establish the pilot demonstration program. The University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (UC SAREP) was selected by the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources to implement the pilot program in consultation with a program advisory review board.
PROGRAM ADVISORY REVIEW BOARD
AB3383 calls for the appointment of a 13-member program advisory review board (Section 593. (a)) The board was appointed in February 1995 by UC Vice PresidentAgriculture and Natural Resources. Members appointed to the program advisory review board were:
Table 1. Members appointed to the program advisory review board.
| Name and Affiliation | Category Specified in AB3383, Section 593 |
| Steven Weinbaum, Dept. of Pomology, UC Davis | University of California |
| Lonnie Hendricks, Farm Advisor, Merced County | University of California |
| Kathy Taylor, US-EPA Region IX | Relevant Federal Agencies |
| Larry Plumb, USDA-Consolidated Farm Services Agency | Relevant Federal Agencies |
| Sherman Boone | Grower |
| Wynette Sills | Grower |
| Greg Nelson | Grower |
| Susan Temple, Bio-Integral Resource Center | Nonprofit Organization |
| Mike Spezia, Community Alliance with Family Farmers Fnd. | Nonprofit Organization |
| Judy Stewart-Leslie | Pest Control Advisor |
| Paul Gosselin | Department of Pesticide Regulation |
| Steve Shaffer | Department of Food and Agriculture |
| Bob Curtis | DPR Pest Management Advisory Committee |
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
AB 3383 states that pilot demonstration projects should be selected through a competitive grants process (Section 592. (b) (4)) and lists the duties expected of UC SAREP (Section 594):
UC SAREP drafted a Request for Proposals (RFP) for pilot demonstration projects and reviewed and finalized this RFP with the program advisory review board in March 1995. The program was entitled Biologically Integrated Farming Systems (BIFS), to indicate that it is distinct from, yet modeled after, the Biologically Integrated Orchard System (BIOS) program, in accordance with AB3383. (Section 592. (b) (3))
Specific policies and procedures to guide the implementation of the pilot demonstration projects were developed by UC SAREP in consultation with the program advisory review board as part of crafting the RFP.
Table 2. Corresponding sections of AB 3383 and the UC SAREP Biologically Integrated Farming Systems Request for Proposals for pilot demonstration projects.
| AB 3383 Section Citation | Request for Proposals Section |
| 591. (a) - (c), 592. (a) & 592. (b) | Introduction |
| 592. (b) (4) | Funding |
| 598. (a) & (b) | Use of Funds |
| 592. (b) (3), 592. (b) (4) & 594. (a) | Criteria |
| 594. (a), 592. (b) (3) & 592. (b) (4) | Procedure and Timeline for Application, Evaluation, and Awards |
| 594. (a) | Publications and Annual Reports |
| 596. | Evaluation and Renewal of Funding |
| 592. (b) (3) | Appendix: A Brief Description Of BIOS Projects |
SELECTION OF PILOT DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
The RFP was mailed to potential applicants and interested parties in May 1995. Completed proposals were due to UC SAREP on July 6, 1995. UC SAREP received five proposals in the first funding cycle of the competitive grants process:
Table 3. Cropping system, applicant, county(s), and funds requested for proposals received in response to the 1996 UC SAREP Biologically Integrated Farming Systems Request for Proposals
| Commodity or Cropping System | Applicant |
County(s) |
Funds Requested (per year) |
| Winegrapes | Mark Chandler & Cliff Ohmart, Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape Commission | San Joaquin & Sacramento | $100, 000 |
| Row Crop Rotations | Jeff Mitchell & Pete Goodell, University of California | Fresno | $91,912 (the initial budget request was for $86,000) |
| Citrus | Benjamin Faber, University of California | Ventura | $56,000 |
| Winegrapes & Pears | Glenn McGourty, University of California | Mendocino | $130,000 |
| Cotton & rotational crops | Will Allen, Sustainable Cotton Project | Madera & Merced | $146,039 |
The program advisory review board was mailed completed proposals for review and met in late July 1995 to evaluate proposals and award grants. Available funds ($670,000 over three years) allowed for the full funding of two projects for three years each. Upon recommendation of the program advisory review board, the UC SAREP director selected two proposals: (1) Implementing a Biologically Integrated Farming System for Winegrapes in the Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape District ("Winegrape BIFS") submitted by Mark Chandler and Cliff Ohmart, Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape Commission; and (2) Extending Biologically Integrated Farming Practices within The San Joaquin Valley's West Side ("West Side BIFS") submitted by Jeff Mitchell and Pete Goodell, University of California. Notifications of awards were made the week of August 1, 1995. The following table provides an overview of the competitive grants process:
Table 4. Overview of pilot demonstration project competitive grants process
| Activity | Time Period | AB 3383 Section Citation |
| Establishment of program advisory review board | February 1995 | 593. (a) |
| UC SAREP & program advisory review board draft and review request for proposals (RFP) | March 1995 | 594. (b) |
| RFP finalized | March 1995 | 594. (b) |
| Printing and mailing of RFP | April 1995 | 594. (b) |
| Proposals due to UC SAREP | July 6, 1995 | 594. (c) |
| Proposals sent to program advisory review board | July 10, 1995 | 594. (c) |
| Proposal evaluation and funding decisions made by UC SAREP and program advisory review board | Week of July 24, 1995 | 594. (c) |
| Notification of awards | Week of August 1, 1995 | 594. (c) |
| UC SAREP & program advisory review board annual review of funded projects and determination of which projects shall be renewed | November 19, 1996 & Follow-up meeting to be held January 13, 1996 | 594. (d) |
SAREP STAFF SUPPORT FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
To help implement the pilot projects, UC SAREP hired a project liaison in September 1995 to work with the funded projects and interface between the contractors and the University. The following objectives were developed to guide the project liaisons work:
1. Provide and/or facilitate natural and social science technical support to management teams in the areas of implementation (team facilitation, group meetings, information sharing, etc.); and monitoring and evaluation (develop appropriate protocols, analyze data, etc.).
2. Oversee the quarterly reporting process for the Winegrape and West Side BIFS projects.
3. Assist with the development and implementation of protocols for documenting and evaluating the overall BIFS program.
Within these overall objectives, the strategic priority for the start-up year of the projects was to establish the infrastructure for the projects, including staff, communications, coordination among management teams, field sites, grower participation, and outreach.
The project liaison has conducted the following activities to meet the above-stated objectives: site visits, field days, project team meetings, telephone and electronic mail consultations, review and feedback on project materials (e.g. monitoring protocols, data sheets, meeting agendas, etc.), review and feedback on project quarterly reports and newsletters, preparation of UC SAREP quarterly reports, and input into several grant proposals relevant to the BIFS program. Specific activities include:
Table 5. Summary of project liaison
activities: September 1995 to December 1996.
(This table does not include a list of the numerous
telepone and electronic mail consultations.)
Site Visits,
Field Days, Project Team Meetings, and other BIFS-Related
Meetings
Contributions to successful US-EPA Grant Proposal to the Central Valley Agricultural Initiative "Building Partnerships for Sustainable Agriculture." |
ANNUAL REPORTING AND REVIEW
AB3383 requires that the program director, in consultation with the program advisory review board, "annually review pilot demonstration projects and determine which projects shall be renewed." (Section 594. (d)) UC SAREP received annual reports from the two funded BIFS projects in November 1996 and mailed copies to the program advisory review board. The review board met on November 19, 1996 with the UC SAREP director and staff involved in the BIFS program to review the status of each project, determine if the projects should received continued funding, and make recommendations for future years. The remainder of this report is based on the BIFS projects annual reports, comments from the program advisory review board, and analysis by the UC SAREP.