For Lupinus angustifolius, Duke (1981) mentioned the the sweet varieties 'Borre,' 'Blanco,' 'Frost,' and 'Rancher.' Bitter varieties include cv 'Richy.' Other varieties not listed as to alkaloid content were 'Unicrop' and 'Uniharvest.' For Lupinus luteus, Duke (1981) listed the cultivars 'Florida Speckled,' and the low-alkaloid and non-shattering varieties 'Weiko II,' and 'Weiko III.'
Per Duke's (1981) account, Lupinus angustifolius seeds occur 3-7 per pod, are ellipsoid to subglobose, smooth and dull, 6-8 mm long, yellow-brown, dark brown, or gray with yellow spots; there are 5,513 seeds/kg.
According to Duke (1981), European yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) seed are 4-6 per pod, 6-8 mm long, 4.5-7.0 mm broad, orbicular-quadrangular, compressed, smooth and dull, black marbled white with a white curved line on each side or all white, and the species has 8,820 seeds/kg.
Lupinus albus cotyledons are yellowish; stipules are absent (Duke, 1981).
Seedling emergence and growth are quite sensitive to cold temperatures and wet soil conditions. (Mark Van Horn, pers. comm.)
Per Duke's (1981) description, Lupinus angustifolius is a short-hairy annual 20-150 cm tall; leaflets 10-50 cm (sic, probably means 10-50 mm) long, 2-5 mm wide, linear to linear-spathulate, glabrous above, sparsely villous beneath; stipules linear-subulate; racemes 10-20 cm long; upper lip of calyx aboutt 4 mm long, 2-dentate, lower lip 6-7 mm long, irregularly 3 dentate to subentire; corolla 11-13 mm long, blue, occasionally pink, purple, or white; legume shortly hirsute, yellow to black, to 6 cm long, 1.5 cm broad.
Duke (1981) described Lupinus luteus as a hairy annual 25-80 cm tall, the stems hairy; leaflets 40-60 mm long, 8-12 mm wide, obovate-oblong, mucronate, sparsely villous; stipules dimorphic, those of the lower leaves 8 mm long, subulate, those of upper leaves 22-30 mm long, 2-4 mm wide, linear-obovate; racemes 5-16 cm long, flowers verticilllate, scented (violet-scented); petals bright yellow; legume 4-6 cm long, 1-1.5 cm wide, densely villous, black.
Based on the account by Duke (1981), frost tolerance in descending order is white lupin > blue lupin > yellow lupin. Based on observations in Tifton, Georgia, the cultivar 'Bicolor' or Spanish lupin shows better frost tolerance than does blue lupin (John Miller, pers. comm.). White lupin tolerates mean annual temperatures of from 5.7-26.2 C, with a mean of 38 cases of 12.7) temperatures of -6 - -8 C are harmful at germination and -3 - -5 C is harmful during flowering (Duke, 1981). White lupin requires a 5-month period with mean monthly temperatures ranging from 15-25 C, with the optimum being 18-24 C (Duke, 1981). Blue lupin tolerates mean annual temperatures of from 5.6-26.2 C, with the mean of 39 cases being 12.3 (Duke, 1981). When vegetative, it tolerates temperatures as low as -6 C, and has a lower germination threshold than do other economic lupins (Duke, 1981). Yellow lupin tolerates mean annual tempteratures of from 6.6-26.2 C, with the mean of 42 cases being 13.0 C (Duke, 1981).
Per Duke's (1981) description, Lupinus angustifolius is native to the Mediterranean Basin and southwestern France. It has been introduced and is now widely grown in Australia, Tasmania, New Zealand, South Africa, northern Europe, and the southeastern U.S.
Duke (1981) described Lupinus luteus as native to the Mediterranean Basin from the Iberian Peninsula and Italy through the Islands of the Meditteranean to the Middle East and Israel. It has been introduced and is cultivated in northern Europe, South Africa, Australia, and the southern U.S.
White and Robson (1989) stated that lupins suffer iron deficiency when grown on calcareous soils, much more so than does field pea. However, this is not due to a lesser ability to acidify the root zone or to an incapacity to reduce Fe3+, as shown with studies of field pea, Lupinus anugustifolius and L. cosentinii in solution culture.
Barrow and Mendoza (1990), in reporting on an experiment concerning a study of crop yields in response to P levels, stated that sigmoid yield responses to increasing levels of a nutrient (in this case, P) suggest that there is a lower threshold concentration below which plants cannot take up the nutrient, and diminishing returns to further addition of the nutrient above an upper threshold. Trials with freshly-applied vs. incubated phosphate using a yellowish brown loamy sand (pH 5.6) showed markedly sigmoid response curves for subterranean clover (cv 'Yarloop') and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius), but not for L. cosentinii or L. luteus. The results suggest that the lupins (especially L. cosentinii) grew better than subterranean clover at low phosphorus concentration. At low levels of phosphate application, roots of subterranean clover were heavily infected with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae; infection but no arbuscules were detected with the lupins. Previous studies had suggested that responses of subterranean clover to added phosphorus are not sigmoid in the presence of mycorrhizal fungi. Findings of the present study are contrary to this.
Hartmann and Aldag (1989) reported that faba bean (cv 'Herz Freya') showed delayed nodulation where soil pH was low but that white lupin (cv 'Eldo') showed no decrease in N-fixation. White lupin cv 'Eldo' was compared with faba bean cv 'Herz Freya' and soybean cv 'Gambit' on five sites. White lupin showed no decrease in N2-fixation at pH < 5.5.
A summary of Duke's (1981) accounts of lupin soil adaptation follows. White lupin is adapted to well-drained, fertile, neutral loams, and moderately-acid to calcareous sandy loams or loamy sands, and is intolerant of waterlogging (although more tolerant than either blue or yellow lupins). It is tolerant of salinity. Blue lupin is said to be tolerant of sand, and of high pH, and is adapted to neutral to moderately-acid sandy loams or loamy sands. Yellow lupin tolerates strongly to mildly acid infertile soils. In its native range, it grows on acid sandy loams.
White and Robson (1989) stated that lupins suffer iron deficiency when grown on calcareous soils, much more so than does field pea. However, these researchers found that this is not due to a lesser ability to acidify the root zone or to an incapacity to reduce Fe3+, as shown with studies of field pea, Lupinus anugustifolius and L. cosentinii in solution culture.
White and Robson (1990) conducted studies on field pea and narrow-leaf lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) grown in nutrient solution at various Fe III EDDHA concentrations, with bicarbonate (HCO3) used in half the cases, to induce iron deficiency. Fe deficience led to rapid distortion and brown discoloration of lupin roots, followed by resumption of apparently normal, though slower, growth. Pea was less affected than lupin in terms of plant growth and tissue concentration of Fe III.
Some Yugoslavian forms of Lupinus angustifolius are said to tolerate maritime sands (Duke, 1981).
Henderson (1989) investigated the effects of sowing density of blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L. cv 'Illyarrie') following a wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L. cv 'Gutha') on a compacted, earthy sand soil. Lupin population densities were established over a range of from 25 to 200 plants per m2. High-density plantings of lupin were better able to alleviate compaction, although lupin biomass declined with indensity increased. Peak biomass production was about 260 g/m2; as density increased, biomass declined about 25%. The reduced soil compaction was apparently due to the increased numbers of taproots penetrating the soil. The contribution to improved wheat yield by the decreased copmaction was estimated to be about 100 kg/ha. In comparison to improvements due to nitrogen fixation and breakage of disease cycles, this contribution is minor, but it could be important on compacted sandplain soils. Other benefits of high stand densities include reduced erosion and crop disease, and better weed control and harvesting.
Lupin is usually inoculated with Rhizobium lupini WU425, but this strain is susceptible to the fungicide iprodione with which lupin seed are treated to protect the plants from a foliar pathogen, Pleiocheata setosa. Another strain of R. lupini, CC606B was much more tolerant of the fungicide but did not nodulate lupin as well. A soil spray of WU425 could be used to inoculate fungicide-treated lupin, but farmers seem not to use this practice. Based on regression analysis, dry matter and seed yields showed a trend (P=0.075) toward an inverse relationship (Evans et al., 1989).
According to Duke, Lupinus albus flowers from May-June, Lupinus angustifolius from April-June, and Lupinus luteus, March-July.
For white lupin cv 'Eldo,' seed yield was 48-450 g/m2 (Hartmann and Aldag, 1989).
Hartmann and Aldag (1989) compared white lupin cv 'Eldo' with faba bean cv 'Herz Freya' on five sites. White lupin developed a deeper root system than did faba bean. In the soil stratum of from 60-90 cm depth, white lupin (cv 'Eldo') root mass was 6 times that of faba bean (cv 'Herz Freya'). Overall root mass was 125 g/square meter for stands of white lupin vs 86 g/square meter for faba bean.
Based on a study by Hartmann and Aldag (1989), faba bean (cv 'Herz Freya') showed delayed nodulation where soil pH was low, whereas white lupin (cv 'Eldo') showed no decrease in N-fixation. 'Eldo' was compared with faba bean cv 'Herz Freya' on five sites. White lupin showed no decrease in N2-fixation at pH < 5.5. Nitrogen gain after seed harvest was 8 g/m2 for both white lupin and faba bean. Nitrogen fixation rates at different locations were approximately as follows: white lupin in 1986: 30, 360, 280, 120, and 240; and in 1988: 20, 250 230, 290, 330 kg/ha2.
Larson et al. (1989) gave N data on white lupin cv's as follows: (1) 'Buttercup': N in whole plant, 1986-1987: 275 kg/ha, 215 (78%) from fixation, 90.9% in seed, biomass: 9.14 Mg/ha; (2) 'Hamburg': N in whole plant, 1986-1987: 279 kg/ha, 219 kg/ha (78%) from fixation: 258 kg/ha, 87.8% in seed, biomass 11.06 Mg/ha; (3) 'Multolupa': N in whole plant, 1985-1986: 345 kg/ha, 247 kg/ha (72%) from fixation, 79.4% in seed, biomass: 15.44 Mg/ha; 1986-1987: 258 kg/ha, 197 (76%) from fixation, 85.7% in seed; biomass 10.64 Mg/ha; (4) 'Ultra': N in whole plant, 1985-1986: 286 kg/ha, 193 (90.9%) in seed, biomass: 11.63 Mg/ha.
Palmason et al. (1992), using 15N isotope dilution method in a field study in Iceland, evaluated N-fixation by narrow-leaf lupin (Lupinus angustifolius and possible N transfer to intercropped grasses. Estimated N fixation was ca 200 kgN/ha for the lupin, of which ca only 2 kgN/ha was transferred to Italian ryegrass.
Gardner et al. (1982) found that white lupin could acquire P through acidification of the rhizosphere and subsequent absorbtion. This can lead to enhanced uptake of P, Mn, and N by intercropped of wheat; the former two nutrients were probably mobilized of by exudates from the lupin roots, then taken up by the closely-associated wheat roots (Gardner and Boundy, 1983).
When grown on calcareous soils, lupins suffer more from iron deficiency than does field pea (White and Robson 1989a). However, studies by these workers of field pea, Lupinus anugustifolius and L. cosentinii in solution culture indicated that this is not due to to a lesser ability of the lupins to acidify the root zone or to an incapacity to reduce Fe3+.
"Bitter" lupins have more toxins. "Sweet" lupins have less or none. Wild bitter lupins grazed by goats may pass toxins on into their milk. (D. Brown, according to Mark Van Horn, pers. comm.)
A subsequent study (Bugg, unpublished data) showed that adult leaffooted bug survived significantly longer when caged in on low-alkaloid strains of blue lupin than on alkaloid-rich (bitter) strains.
Blue lupin appears to be more susceptible to plant-parasitic nematodes than are other lupins. Nematodes attacking blue lupin include Aphelenchoides bicaudatus, Belonolaimus gracilis, Ditylenchus dipsaci, Helicotylenchus dihystera, Meloidogyne hapla, M. incognita, M. incognita acrita, M. javanica, M. thamesi, Pratylenchus brachyurus, P. coffeae, P. penetrans, P. zeae, and Tylenchus costatus (Duke, 1981).
Based on an account from Spain, principally concerning white lupin, herbicides are required in the culture of sweet Lupinus, yields of which are otherwise severely reduced by weeds (Pozuelo et al., 1989).

For more information about SAREP email link.